In this post I write about some changes that could be made in my career: Archaeology in the Universidad de Chile.
To be able to study archaeology you must first enter the anthropology program -at least in this university- I think its a really necessary to the formation , In respect of the curriculum I suppose that change the theoretical perceptive in the subjects we need to learn, with the incorporation of new teachers. On the other hand I think is important that there, are more activities in the field for the practice a both social and physical anthropology and archaeology.
On the other hand I believe the workload in this programme it's too demanding because you need a lot of time to read and write!, truly I learned to reading comprehension in this career. About the length of studies I considered it´s well, although I feel has been longer!
Regarding the faculty facilities I think it´s okey for now, but if the enroll continues to grow the infrastructure the campus Juan Gomez Milla soon can´t cope! Since I enroll, all years building a new structure and the green areas are out of places, filling with cement the place that previously had a pasture and trees.
Regarding the use of technology in a career, I think it is basic and somewhat precarious, specifically with specific tools of measurement and analysis for studies in archaeology, although it has a good number of computers available equipped with programs for analysis and creation of schemes, maps among others, there should be an increase in instruments.
Finally I imagine that the incorporation of teachers within the department in case it will bring changes in teaching methods, giving special emphasis on having younger people!
I think that so many career in FACSO need more practice activities, in psychology we only had the professional practice :(
ResponderEliminarIn my opinion, it is also neccesary to do a real interdisciplinary work with the three mentions. We really need that!
ResponderEliminarIt is a sad reality but we are taking away the rest spaces for putting more buildings :(
ResponderEliminar